The Case For Legalization
As drug war hysteria subsides it becomes increasingly certain that there must be a serious re-examination of the laws prohibiting marijuana. The decriminalization of soft drugs has now emerged as an active political issue in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, France and Australia. The policies being considered range from "decriminalization," or repeal of criminal penalties for private use and cultivation of cannabis, to full "legalization," in which cannabis is commercially sold like alcohol, tobacco and other commodities.
Decriminalization has enjoyed
impressive support from a succession of official panels, including the
Presidential Commission on Marijuana (1973), the California Research Advisory
Panel (1990), the National Academy of Sciences (1982), and the Canadian Le Dain
Commission (1970). Decriminalization was also officially the policy of the state
of Alaska from 1976 through 1990, when it was narrowly overturned in a
referendum. The basic appeal of decriminalization is to reduce the harm of
criminal punishment and respect personal freedom and privacy, while avoiding
offensive commercialization. The basic flaw in decriminalization is that it does
not make allowance for pot users who cannot or will not grow their own. The
result is to create an illicit black market for cannabis that is neither
regulated nor taxed, leaving many of the same basic enforcement problems as
prohibition.
These problems can be avoided by legalization, under which cannabis could be legally sold, taxed and regulated like alcohol or tobacco. (It should be noted that legalization need not involve the evils of commercialization, given suitable restrictions on advertising.)
Yet the plant remains illegal today!

[1] This is Re-legalize Hemp Page 1 of 1.
[2] Go To Re-legalize Hemp Page 2 of 2.